When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving the Grand Star Cargo Vehicle B.

On April 13, 2018, the Defendant moved to the right bypassing about 10km from the long distance to the long distance of 68 in the city in the direction of the railway station in the direction of the city.

Since the location is where signal lights and crosswalks are installed, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk by checking whether there is a person to build the crosswalk by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, without temporarily stopping in front of the crosswalks, the head and the body part of the victim C (79 years old, south) in accordance with the pedestrian green signals of the crosswalks were contacted with the head and the body part of the victim C (79 years old, south) with the front wheeler and the body part of the victim's vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as the mouth of the frightter, which requires rehabilitation treatment for about three months, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Bluice photographs and traffic information CCTV images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The circumstances favorable to the defendant for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the defendant, the fact that the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, the victim's children are taking advantage of the defendant's wife, the fact that the defendant has already entered the crosswalk after being changed to the pedestrian signal), the unfavorable circumstances (the fact that the accident of this case occurred by entering the crosswalk after being changed to the pedestrian signal, and the fact that the accident of this case occurred.