except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 4, 2014, around 15:20 on June 15, 2014, the Defendant assaulted another person at “D cafeteria” located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and arrested a person in the act of committing a crime to F and G, and caused him to board the patrol vehicle after receiving a report, and caused him to board the patrol vehicle. On the other hand, the Defendant sprinked the f to sphere the f to sphere and additionally cut off the f to the end of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of H, F, and G;

1. A written statement of I and J;

1. Photographs of damaged parts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that a person commits a misunderstanding and has no record of punishment heavier