However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 01:10 on August 13, 2016, the Defendant: (b) informed the victim C (n, 49 years of age) (hereinafter “Dran bar”); (c) informed the victim’s head, fright, 3 times by drinking the victim’s face; (d) took the victim’s head, fright, and fright the victim’s face, which is a dangerous object located on the floor; and (e) inflicted an injury on the victim, flading the victim beyond the fire extinguishing machine, which is a dangerous object located on the floor, for about three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in preparation of a letter of apology against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a victim's photograph, on-site photograph, details of reporting 112, and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - The defendant, who is disadvantageous to the reason for sentencing, committed the crime of this case without being able to reflect, even though he/she was a person having multiple violent criminal records. - The crime of inflicting bodily injury on a female victim in the smuggling room is pleasurey, despite that the victim did not have any harm to the defendant. - the victim does not have any harm to the defendant. - The victim does not have any punishment for the defendant any longer. The sentence as ordered by the order is taking into account all the conditions of sentencing revealed in the trial process.