beta
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2016.12.27 2016가단53996

공사대금

Text

1. As to the Plaintiff’s extreme industry, Defendant Kudong Co., Ltd.: KRW 171,098,400 and KRW 114,400,00 among them, Defendant Kudong Co., Ltd., Ltd.: October 1, 2014

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. The Plaintiff partially dismissed filed a claim for damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum as of the date this judgment became final and conclusive and as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings with respect to the amount of damages for the Defendant Cinematographic Business. However, since the obligation to pay damages for delay occurs only when the formation of a judgment of revocation of a fraudulent act becomes final and conclusive, the liability for delay occurs from the day following the day when this judgment becomes final and conclusive and the claim for damages for delay is recognized only as civil legal interest rate pursuant to the proviso of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion