However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 13, 2017, between around 03:48 and around 04:50, the Defendant intruded into a steel frame, which was a store located in the front of the D periodical located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, into a rooftop, and was located therein.

E Articles 80,000 and 195,00 won in total in the market value of the F management of the victim of the E's garment point sales volume, 14 garments in total equivalent to 1,648,000 won in the market value, 20 clothes in total in the market value, and 1,648,000 won in total in the market value, and 3 garment in total in the market value of the victim H management of the Ha of G garment point sales volume, and 600,000 clothes in total in the market value of 50,000,000 won in the market value, including 20,000 won in total in the market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of F and H;

1. Application of each police seizure list statute;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of the Criminal Act / [the scope of the recommended punishment / [the scope of the recommended punishment] General Property in consideration of the following factors: (a) the special mitigation area (from April to one year and six months) / [the special mitigation person] in cases where he intrudes into any place other than indoor residential space, (b) the crime is against the crime; (c) the non-prosecution of the punishment [the decision of the punishment]; (d) the fact that there is no criminal history; and (e)