2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be postponed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

1. "2014 Highest 3072";

A. From October 27, 2014, the Defendant has been engaged in delivery duties in the “Eart” of the victim D’s operation in Gwangju City from around October 27, 2014.

At around 14:00 on November 3, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the victim’s property with the above 191,460 won total market price, such as 3,220,000 won and 6,000 won and 4,000,000 won and 2,000,000 won and 3,2220,00,000 won and 2,000,000 won and 2,000,000 and 191,460,00 and 2,000,000 and 1,000,000 won and 3,00,00 and 3,220,000 and 3,00,00 won and 3,00,00 won and 3,00,00 won and 3,00,00 won and 3,00.

B. On November 3, 2014, the Defendant purchased a number of 30,000 won from the 16:03 Seocho-si, Gwangju Metropolitan City Gyeong-si Galetlet 907, and made the Samsung Card in the name of embezzlement as in paragraph (1) as if he were the lawful card holder, and had the above employee H present the card to the above employee as if he was the card holder, and then delivered one DNA to the above employee. 2) On November 16:03, 2014, the Defendant issued one credit card to the above employee after signing the card and issued the above employee. Then, the Defendant received the above 30,000 won credit card holder’s signature from the above 39,000 won credit card holder’s electronic sales to the above employee. 1.0,000 won credit card holder’s electronic sales from the above 39,000 won credit card holder’s electronic sales to the above employee.

C. The Defendant in violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act shall pay each item at the same time and place as the above B.