Nevertheless, the court below held that the defendant is obligated to submit personal information when the suspended sentence becomes invalidated while rendering a judgment of the suspended sentence of a fine of two million won. In so doing, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the duty to submit personal information, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

(Legal Formios). The sentencing of the lower court (the suspended sentence of a fine of two million won) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

(F) Determination; 2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of misapprehension of the legal doctrine, whether the judgment of suspended sentence imposed the obligation to register personal information on a defendant for whom the judgment of suspended sentence became final and conclusive due to a sex offense falls under the basic legislative policy issue. However, in the event that the court issues a conviction on a person who committed a sexual crime (excluding suspended sentence) under the main sentence of Article 16(2) and Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes concerning the Order to Attend and order to complete a program (hereinafter referred to as “order to attend a course or order to complete a sexual assault treatment program”) with regard

Unlike the provisions that exclude suspension of sentence in this conviction, Article 42 (Persons subject to Registration of Personal Information) (1) Article 2 (1) 3 and 4, (2) (limited to paragraph (1) 3 and 4), and Articles 3 through 15 of the Act on the Registration of Personal Information and a sex offense subject to registration referred to in subparagraph 2 of Article 2 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.