2. In light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, the fact that the instant vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance, the fact that the Defendant agreed to the effect that the Defendant was the first offender who did not have any record of criminal punishment, etc. However, the instant accident was extremely poor in the nature of the crime that the Defendant was a victim C while driving a vehicle in violation of the signal, while driving the vehicle. The instant accident was extremely poor in the nature of the crime; the victim suffered damage due to the instant accident, such as mination and mination of the left-hand side in need of treatment for about eight weeks of the instant accident, and the result was serious in the damage caused by the instant accident, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, background and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendant is deemed reasonable, and it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the Defendant is excessively unreasonable.

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.