When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 7, 2019, at around 17:50, the Defendant committed a assault against the victim D (W, 58 years of age) who is suspected of having a inhumanity relationship with her husband, and against this, the Defendant committed a brupt of the victim’s head with both hands.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of witness D;

1. The application of the confirmation of the occurrence of the case, photographic materials, investigation reports (Attachment to D-related judgments), attached judgments, investigation reports (Cable phone calls for reference) and investigation reports (CCTV) and attached video-related statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on Article 62 (1) of the suspended execution of sentence against the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant resisted the victim's injury, and did not assault the victim as stated in the facts charged. Thus, it is reasonable to determine that the defendant abused the victim in light of the evidence mentioned above, especially the CCTV video, and the behavior of the defendant and the victim before and after the crime that can be known by CCTV video. Thus, the above argument is rejected.

The reason for sentencing is without violence, and the defendant has continuously suffered damage from the victim since 2011, and the defendant's character, conduct, environment, etc. can be seen through the oral argument in this case shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration all the circumstances.