However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 11, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving the CMF5 vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from the new NN apartment parking lot located on April 11, 2016, 707, which was in effect at around 3km from the 7km apartment to the 439-day Ga.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is a holder of CM5 car.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act (unlicensed Driving), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and the selection of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the suspended sentence is recognized by mistake and the fact that there is no previous conviction in excess of the fine);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;