However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 5, 2007, the defendant has been punished two times or more for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) by receiving a fine of 1.5 million won as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving under the influence of sound), and by receiving a summary order of a fine of 4 million won in the same court on August 2, 2007 from the same court.

On January 7, 2019, at around 04:20, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in the E Sti-type under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.066% from a section of approximately 700 meters, which is located in Seo-gu, Seowon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and up to D’s front road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal history records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of the same kind of power)-application of two Acts and subordinate statutes attached to summary orders;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Act on Probation and Order to Attend a lecture has been served four times as a crime for the same kind of sentencing, all of them shall be decided as ordered in consideration of the fact that it is a crime before ten years, the blood alcohol concentration level, etc.