except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 2009, the Defendant made a false statement that “The construction of sculptures equivalent to KRW 1,880,000,000,000,00,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,00

However, since the defendant has no connection with the construction work of sculptures in the (junland), there was no intention or ability to help the victim to perform the construction work, and the amount received from the victim from the victim was considered to be used as a personal project fund.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 18 million from the victim through D through several times during the period from June 26, 2009 to March 25, 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired KRW 18 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution (including each statement of C and D);

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. A copy of the details of passbook transactions and transactions thereof;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation reports and investigation reports;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of the relationship between the defendant and the victim, the background of the crime in this case, and the fact that the defendant has no sentence heavier than imprisonment);