The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that the charges of this case were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors of violating the law of logic and experience and violating the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a fine is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the

In addition, the argument that the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to copyright infringement or recognition of illegality is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not consider it as the ground for appeal or that the court below did not consider it as the subject

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.