However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2018. 1. 12. 10:30 경 광주 서구 C에 있는 △△ 피씨방에서 그 곳 손님인 피해자 D(22 세) 이 쳐 다 보았다는 이유로 피해자 D이 앉아 있던 좌석의 의자 등받이 부분을 발로 차고 손으로 피해자 D의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고, 피고인의 행동을 제지하던 피해자 E(27 세) 의 머리와 얼굴 부위를 주먹으로 수회 때리고 얼굴 부위를 발로 2-4 회 하고, 무릎으로 배 부위를 2회 찼다.

As a result, the defendant assaulted D and got scarcity in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to victim E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of each video statute to field photographs and CCTV images CDs;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime concerned;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspended sentence is that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects it, and the degree of injury suffered by the victim E is serious;

The punishment was determined in consideration of the fact that it is difficult to see, the health status of the defendant, and all the circumstances revealed through the argument in this case.