However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On July 16, 2016, from around 08:05 to around 08:30 on July 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim D’s Et, which is operated by the victim D in Suwon-gu Suwon-si C, with a large interest of the victim’s “sringing, opening,” without any justifiable reason; (b) took the victim’s actions to get off the clothes, and interfere with the operation of the feet by force for about 25 minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as drinking, drinking, drinking, and taking a bath.

On September 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) from around 09:00 to around 09:10 on September 30, 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (b) under the influence of alcohol from around 09:0 to around 09:10 on the calculation of the ‘G convenience store’ in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si; (c) brought about the so-called so-called “g convenience store; (d) brought about the so-called “g convenience store; (e) brought about the girth of the Victim H’s hand; (e) took money on the part of the Victim H’s hand; and (e) interfered with the victim’s convenience store business for about 10 minutes by taking advantage of

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographs and ctv video data by capturing CCTV images;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (elective of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the grounds for sentencing) are recognized as erroneous by the defendant, and the sentencing as ordered in light of the fact that all the victims agreed to agree with each other, the degree of interference with each other, and other circumstances.