beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2019.09.20 2019고단796

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those who are engaged in driving of cussa car B;

On June 15, 2019, around 22:30 on June 15, 2019, the Defendant came to proceed in the direction of viewing the Dong Sea from the e elementary school room, depending on the two-lane distance intersections in front of the “Drown Department” located in the East Sea C.

At the time, the vehicle is at night and at the same time a frequent private-distance intersection. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle shall safely drive the motor vehicle, such as making it possible for the person engaged in driving the motor vehicle to take into account the traffic situation at the front and right right and right and right and right and right and right by accurately operating the steering and steering system and not conflicting with the vehicle

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving so as to prevent the Defendant from driving under the influence of alcohol, and the part behind the right side of the victim F(the age of 46) in front of the Defendant’s vehicle was shocked with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to cerebrovasil, etc. without any room in two weeks open for treatment of the victim. At the same time, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the said visible car to the extent of repairing expenses equivalent to KRW 977,876; and (b) did not immediately stop the said car to rescue the victim; and (c) escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) by the Defendant committed the second shock of the said F vehicle when the Defendant escaped after causing a traffic accident as stated in the foregoing 1.

Since then, the Defendant received a report from F 112 from F that “the Defendant escaped from a traffic accident,” and received a request for the measurement of alcohol from F to I for the circumstances belonging to the H district unit in the East Sea Police Station.

At the time, the police officer's question is about the 112 report to the effect that the police officer escaped with the accident.