해임처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the second and seventh deeds “2015. 7” in the second and seventh deeds of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “ October 21, 2015,” and (b) the third and eleven deeds “store” in the first instance judgment shall be deemed to be “severing,” and (c) it shall be deemed to be the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of
(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim on February 2, 201, even if the Plaintiff’s claim was not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s claim in the first instance trial, and all of the evidence additionally submitted in the first instance and the first instance trial were examined, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim on this case is justifiable. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and therefore, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per