beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.04.20 2018고단255

절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for habitual larceny in October, 2015, and the above judgment was finalized on December 15, 2015. However, on June 9, 2016, the sentence of the suspended sentence was revoked, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Net Prison on January 27, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 11, 2017, around 10:00, the Defendant was seated in the stairs leading to the rooftop before the victim D's house No. 105, 1506, the Defendant came to know of the password, and when the victim and his family members came to know of the password, the Defendant and his family came to open a door by dividing the password after the opening of the house and dividing the password after the opening of the house, and put about KRW 200,000,000 in cash, such as the flus, paper paper, etc., in the low flusium and the low flusium and flusium, which were on the small flusium, and entered the flusium.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and stolen the victim's property.

2. On October 19, 2017, at around 14:00, the Defendant: (a) reported on Oct. 19, 2017, 103 Dong 103 and 1306 of the above apartment building; (b) came to know of the password from the stairs leading to the rooftop before the victim E’s house; and (c) the victim opened the entrance door and opened the entrance door, and entered the entrance door, and (d) 1.8 K mp in which the victim’s market price is equivalent to 2 million won, and 1.3 million won in sight (i.e., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and stolen the victim's property.

3. On November 8, 2017, at around 09:00, the Defendant came to the house of the Victim F, No. 103 Dong 1106, the above apartment building, and the Defendant came to know of the password while getting out of the stairs at the time of the crime of the above paragraph 2. When the Defendant came to know of the personal identification, the Defendant might find out the gap between the Defendant and the house.