However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date of the judgment.

Defendants were able to steal Mas from the DPC room, which is in the government city C as a friendship-friendly family member.

On May 19, 2017, when the Defendants entered the said PC room on May 19, 2017 and used the PC as a customer, the Defendants used the gap in which the peripheral surveillance was neglected, and 28 and 29 table lines were fixed with cables, and two Maxs in the victim E’s market price connected with the computer were 140,000 won.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A written statement of F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (for example, CCTV for damaged places) and report internal investigation (for example, for the verification ofCCTV and on-site);

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act; and the choice of imprisonment, respectively.

1. Small amount mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55 subparag. 1 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Act (The following factors are considered in favor of the Defendants among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Defendants who hold a suspended sentence: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considering the grounds for reduction of amount);

1. Defendants of a community service order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommended punishment] [the grounds for sentencing] of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the grounds for sentencing] of the mitigated area (4 to 10 months) of the mitigated area (the special mitigated person] [the decision of sentencing] of punishment [the Defendants committed the instant crime again despite the fact that the Defendants had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had been suspended

However, the defendants recognize and seriously reflect the crime of this case, the victim does not want to punish the defendant, the defendants are the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment, and other age, sex, environment, and crime of the defendant.