However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 23:00 on October 4, 2016, the Defendant received a report from 112 that he was employed by a guest in front of the building B of the building B of the Yeongdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and received a recommendation for returning home from the C District Assistant D of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and received a report from the Defendant, “I do not have to know, and what she reported.”

“The chest parts of the above D,” referred to as “the A’s chest parts on the head of the A, and continued to gather, put them in the iron box, and put them in the air,” and assaulted D’s chest parts on two occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 report processing and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on film and video materials to the defendant's written statement D

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant reflects the wrong or that there is no same military force and there is no criminal record exceeding the fine);