The term "A" shall be one year of imprisonment, and the term "Defendant B" shall be four months of imprisonment.

from the date of this judgment.

Defendant

A is the owner of the D Gameland in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul and the third floor, and Defendant B is the employee.

1. He/she shall not provide game water not classified as the rating of the Committee on Water Management of Defendant A Game, or exchange the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water as a business;

From September 2016 to November 18:30 on September 25, 2016, the Defendant provided customers with certain game products not classified in D Gameland, and converted the scores obtained by customers into 10,000 won in cash per 10,000 won, and then exchanged them after deducting the fee of 5-10% from the fee.

2. From November 23, 2016 to November 25, 2016, Defendant B provided game products that were not classified as above and exchanged results in the same game in the same game, Defendant B, while being aware of the fact that A provided game products that were not classified as above and exchanged results, provided the game forum when he did not have A along with E, and provided coffee and tobacco sprinks.

The Defendant, together with E, was able to facilitate the illegal business crimes of A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol for the Defendants and E

1. A written statement of F, G, H and I;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on response as a result of appraisal;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 1 and 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 32(2) of the Criminal Act mitigated for aiding and abetting, and Article 55(1)3 of the same Act

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination of a sentence under Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act, Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Recommendation type of sentencing criteria: Imprisonment for a period of eight months and two years and three months (Defendant A);

2. Decision of punishment: to recognize errors;

Defendant

A shall be sentenced to two times the suspension of execution and nine times the fine.