2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances: (a) even if the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case; (b) the victim does not want the punishment at the investigation stage; and (c) the economic situation is difficult, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant while driving a taxi with the central line by negligence and causing bodily injury to the victim who is a taxi passenger; and (c) the case is not weak in light of the degree of negligence; (d) particularly, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is limited to six weeks of medical treatment; (e) the defendant has been sentenced one time of suspended sentence due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; and (e) the defendant has been sentenced one time of fine for the violation of the Road Traffic Act; and (e) other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (e) circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.