beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.02.13 2014고합154

현주건조물방화등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From 2010, the Defendant was living together with C for ten years, and was living in F’s Officetel A-dong 805, which was managed by E in Ansan-si D.

1. On June 12, 2014, the Defendant, at around 22:42, returned home to the instant officetel A, 805, flusium and flusium, and flusium C, the Defendant: (a) had a view to the horses, thereby damaging the Defendant’s property damage to ensure that approximately KRW 669,00,00 of the repair cost for several times, including the air conditioners, clothes, blusium, blusium, and TV installed therein.

2. On June 12, 2014, at around 23:30 on June 12, 2014, the Defendant filed a 112 report at the location described in paragraph (1) and destroyed part of the walls of the 8th floor of the instant officetel, which is a building in which people exist, and which is a building used as a residence, because C filed a 112 report on the grounds that the Defendant’s act was the same as the Defendant’s stated in paragraph (1) and the police called out to move out. However, the Defendant destroyed part of the wall of the 805th floor and the clothes of the instant officetel, which is a building used as a residence, by putting a fire on the dives of the dives.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Each statement made by the police officer C and E of the protocol of statement;

1. Statement of report on internal investigation prepared by the police; and

1. Entry of the police record of seizure;

1. Each description of a statement of account and written estimate;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's defense of each video and defense counsel's defense of seized articles, field photographs (Evidence No. 36-39 of the evidence records), field photographs (Evidence No. 41-63 of the evidence records), and damaged photographs (Evidence No. 89-93 of the evidence records). Thus, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant had a mental and physical disorder by making a statement that the defendant had been drunk at the time of committing each of the crimes of this case. Thus, according to the records, it is recognized that the defendant had drinking a certain degree of alcohol at the time of committing each of the crimes of this case,