However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

On July 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on July 7, 2016, 2016, 23:45, 23:45, 2016, 2:4:4:45, the Defendant: (b) on a car page run by the victim D D; (c) on the ground that the victim made a false statement, 3:3 Cicks in an amount equivalent to the total market value of KRW 82,00,00, which is owned by the victim; and (d) destroyed the 82:00 micks; (c) 3 micks;

The Defendant of "2016 Highest 5661", on July 16, 2016, changed the alcohol in the upper car page of around 22:10 on July 22:10, 2016, changed the alcohol in large sound, made a card after drinking alcohol, and made the card after drinking alcohol.

Now may file a complaint by more than one step.

In other words, “the victim was threatened,” and the victim expressed his/her desire to “this Chewing baby,” and obstructed the victim’s preparation of business by force by avoiding the disturbance of tobacco at the inside of the business establishment for one hour.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 4402"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Reporting on investigation (referring to reporting on hearing statements by telephone amount of damage) 2016 Colonel 5661;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police suspect against D;

1. E statements;

1. D's damaged photographs;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying departments related to reporting;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each type of crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the said Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes against a person who interferes with heavier business affairs);

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Class 1 Crimes (Obstruction of Duties) [Scope of Recommendation] Obstruction of Duties (Interference with Type 1 (Obstruction of Duties) (Specially mitigated Persons)] Suspension of Punishment (including a serious effort to recover damage);

B. In the event that the actual damage (i.e., damage) is minor in the area of special mitigation (i.e., one month or six months) (i.e., damage to property), the general standard for the crime (i.e., damage to property) (ii) (ii) (i.e., a person subject to special mitigation) is not subject to punishment (ii).