beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2013.09.26 2013고단324

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 324"

1. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint rupture) was aware that he was frying on the chest, who was frying on the chest, and frying on the chest, who was frying on the chest, and frying on the chest, and that he was frying with the organized violence and frying. D, E, as a vessel of the victim F, and the victim G, had the victims take money from the victims, and had the victims take money from the victims D and E, and used it to attract cash from the victims.

Around February 26, 2013, the Defendant d, E, and the 20:30 on the 20th day of 20:30 on the shyang-si H, and D called “the victim F (the 14-year-old-old-old-age-old-si-si-si (hereinafter referred to as “the 14-year-old-age-old-si-si-si-si-si”, called “the 14-year-old-si-si-si-si (hereinafter referred to as “the 14-year-old-age-old-si-si”) to call to the

B. At around 23:00 on February 26, 2013, D received one debit card from the victim on the part of the victim G (the 14 years of age) who is close to the J, stating that “G shall receive money by telephone,” and that “F shall make a request for the victim’s telephone,” and that “F shall make a request for payment of money,” and the Defendant, D, and E also withdrawn 50,000 won in cash by using the said debit card at a convenience store located within the private distance of K apartment.

Accordingly, the defendant jointly with D and E, and received 3,000 won for taxi and 50,000 won in cash from the victims of drinking, which were frightened.

2. Suppression;

A. On December 2012, the Defendant reported that the victim L(16 years of age) was 3.50,000 won before and purchased from the Defendant, and that the victim drinking the Defendant, who was frighted to the Defendant, was “a thickness again” and cut off the victim from the victim’s 3.50,000 won at the market price.