except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 19, 2011, the Defendant testified after being sworn as a witness of the case of compensation for delay at the Seoul Southern District Court 311 located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, and the same court 2010Kadan86604.

The defendant sent to the plaintiff's attorney's answer that "I would like to find office D and paid the construction cost in advance because it is difficult for the defendant company to pay the construction cost," and the defendant's counsel asked that "I would like to pay 100 million won in advance for the smooth progress of the construction work," and the defendant's counsel asked that "I would have paid 100 million won at the time of the contract." The next amount of money paid to the defendant's counsel "I would have paid 100 million won at the time of the completion of the structural construction of new building." The defendant's counsel asked that "I would have paid 100 million won at the time of the completion of the structural construction of new building," and the defendant's attorney's answer that "I would not pay 100 million won after the payment of construction cost to the defendant company on March 18, 2009."

However, with respect to the new construction of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Multi-household Construction, the contractor F, G’s agent A and the contractor H Co., Ltd. (Representative D) agreed on September 5, 2008 at the same time as the contract and the commencement, the payment of 100 million won at the time of the completion of the pelM, the payment of 100 million won at the time of the completion of the pelM, and the remainder payment within 90 days from the date of the completion of the completion of the pelM. Although the pelM was completed on October 2008, the Defendant was not paid 10 million won at the time of the completion of the pelM, and the pelM

3. From June 3, 2009 to November 2, 2009, approximately KRW 270 million was paid as construction cost.

As a result, the defendant was working as the owner's agent, the defendant was aware of the above points and was false in violation of memory.