On October 3, 2018, at around 17:38, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in front of C Child Care Center B, and was urged to return home from E and F of the police station’s police box sent out after receiving 112 a report that “under the influence of alcohol,” the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of C Child Care Center B, and was under the control of E and F of the police station’s police station’s police station, who was urged to return home from E and F of the police station’s police station. In doing so, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the place of service for internal investigation reports (field status, etc.), 112 reported cases handling records, and Category D police boxes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and reasons for sentencing under Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act for the choice of punishment;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One to five years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] of the obstruction of performance of official duties: [Type 1] No person shall be subject to the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of official duties [the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] (the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] basic area, six months to one year and six months.

3. Determination of sentence: Six months of imprisonment;