beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.06.24 2016고정566

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 26, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.085% among blood transfusions on around 22:12, the Defendant driven Cchip car at a section of about 50 meters from the front side of the original apartment road by the Punga in Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, to the front side of the public parking lot for the bathing beach public in the same Dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver at home and report of the situation of the driver at home;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. On November 26, 2015, the Defendant, as a person holding Crando a car, operated the said car without mandatory insurance from approximately 50 meters away from the front side of the original apartment road to the front side of the bathing beach public parking lot located in Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, to the front side of the apartment road.

2. The judgment is based on the mandatory insurance inquiry that seems consistent with the above facts charged, although some of the records are written on the police interrogation protocol against the defendant, according to the original register of automobile registration, instructions on change of automobile insurance contract, inquiry into the contract, automobile insurance certificate, and the result of inquiry into the fact about the insurance company in the modern world, the defendant acquired the ownership of D's automobile, which is prior to the crackdown on driving by drinking, and purchased the ownership of the D's automobile, and purchased the automobile registration number from D to C on June 23, 2015. The fact that the vehicle registration number was changed from D to C on November 27, 2015, the vehicle registration number changed to C on November 27, 2015, and the validity of the comprehensive insurance that was previously subscribed to the same vehicle after the registration of the vehicle number was maintained. If the facts are the same, the above facts can be acknowledged.