The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

around 05:00 on September 22, 2016, Defendants were flick-gu and flick-gu, and flick-gu, Busan, the victim D, operated in Suwon-gu, Busan, and flick-gu.

On September 22, 2016, at around 07:20, the Defendants received a demand from the victim D, the main place of which is the EM, to “any change in business hours due to the end of business hours.”

However, the Defendants did not comply with the request to leave the victim without justifiable reasons until the police officers dispatched by the victim's report on the same day at around 09:20 on the same day arrive.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to leave the victim and did not comply with the demand of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 319(2), Article 319(1), and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the criminal proceedings orders for provisional payment

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. At around 09:20 on September 22, 2016, Defendant A’s insulted Defendant A, after receiving a report from Defendant D by the operator of the singing shop, that he did not pay the drinking value at the above E’s shop, and was called “after the administrative procedure is subsequently confirmed as to whether or not there is any health certificate for the entertainment receptionr, calculated the drinking value,” followed by Defendant A’s objection that “the victim before the said singing shop proprietor D and H are viewed to have been engaged in the instant singing shop business,” and the police’s confirmation of health certificate that he had been in the instant singing room business, D and H, if you wanted to do so, I would like to gather the cattle, law, if you were to do so, I would like to easily gather, and develop fake that caused the business.

Magin, tin-opener.

The term "patently insulting the victim by openly booming the large interest."

B. Defendant B’s insult on September 22, 2016, at around 09:20 around September 22, 2016, as set forth in paragraph (3).