However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 15:50 on August 21, 2020, the Defendant: (a) sought an inspection by the Defendant, who shall undergo an inspection at the Corrogate or sorting clinic of the hospital C in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul; (b) was able to enter another hospital that was previously hospitalized, and (c) but there were many people from the employees of the said hospital, thus doing so; (c) around 17:30 on the same day, the Defendant heard the entrance level before the emergency room; and (d) took the entrance door three times from the police officer stationed at the emergency room of the above hospital D in Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul; and (d) when the Defendant took part in the interview with the face of the above hospital, she sawd “hyke, opening, and kiding the emergency room,” and she took part in the assault with E, such as assaulting the victim’s face to her khh by brying it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the F and G respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The defendant under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act does not repeat the suspended sentence;

consideration of the circumstances described in the

1. To impose an observation of protection to prevent a criminal defendant from recommitting a crime of the same kind in consideration of the circumstances in which the criminal records of the same crime can be taken into account;