A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the crime of this case is not good and that the amount of damage is considerable, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant when considering the fact that the defendant did not agree with the victims.

However, considering the Defendant’s age, the Defendant’s mistake is often divided in depth, the fact that the benefits earned by the Defendant are not high, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s above assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.