손해배상(기)
1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiff shall be against the defendant B.
1. The court's reasoning for this part of the basic facts is that "No. 11" of the first instance court No. 3, No. 3, No. 17 of the judgment, "No. 11" is "Evidence No. 11, No. 17", "Goods Price Liability" of the fifth 12 of the judgment is "Goods Price Guarantee", "The plaintiff's Compensation Decision and Procedure Provisions" of the seventh 17 of the 7th 7th 7th 21 to 8th 2 of the 7th 7th 7th 21, "the plaintiff's Compensation Decision and Procedure Provisions" shall be "the plaintiff's Compensation Decision and Procedure Provisions at the time of the second 7th 21th 7th 21 to 2 of the 8th 2nd 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 20. "The gross negligence in paragraph (1) means the case where the manager's duty of care corresponding to his duty of care and good faith is significantly concealed or significantly with his duty of care.
Article 4(4) of the Civil Procedure Act provides that “A good manager’s care shall be determined by an ordinary person’s judgment based on objective standards, rather than by his or her own due care as a person with ordinary thinking and experience.” < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20348, Jul. 10, 2012; Presidential Decree No. 20358, Jul. 10, 2012>
2. The plaintiff's assertion and the criteria for determining the existence of liability for damages.