If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 02:30 on June 13, 2018, the Defendant used a 303 East-gu Incheon apartment complex B in front of the house, and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the handling of the report by assaulting the above police officers, such as a slope D belonging to the Gyeyang Police Station C District in the Gyeyang-gu Police Station and a chill E, sent out after receiving a report 112, to have returned home from the above police officers, who want to have the above police officers wear home from the said police officers, such as “this sprinke”, “all sprinke”, and “all sprinke”, which led to the Defendant’s 4-5 walking of the above D’s mouth, which continuously strings home, and continuously strings home.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable condition: The defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake.

There is no other history of punishment except that the defendant has been punished twice by a fine already.

Unfavorable circumstances: The act of obstructing the performance of official duties by police officers is detrimental to the exercise of public authority, so heavy punishment is needed.