If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 11, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Victim BX purchases BX’s game money” on the Internet transaction website, and that “The Defendant would sell gold 50,000 won if deposited KRW 150,000,000.”

However, the defendant did not have an intent or ability to pay a game money even if he received money from the injured party because he did not own the game money.

However, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 150,000 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant from the victim and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against BX;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of transfer, and the Kakao Stockholm dialogue between the suspect and the suspect;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although there are many criminal records of the same kind of punishment for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the crime of this case was committed for a repeated crime period, considering the fact that the crime of this case was merely one case and the amount of damage was not much significant (the sentence of imprisonment was already sentenced for the same crime committed before and after the crime of this case, and the trial is still pending).