However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim C(26 years old) and D(24 years old) are foreign workers with the nationality of Thailand.

1. Around 01:05 on February 21, 2016, the injured Defendant reported that G and its behaviors in the exclusive club, “F” located in the T, Thailand, “F,” and that G and their behaviors are in conflict with the victims, and when the Defendant was passing following G’s daily activities, the injured victim C and C were living in the Defendant’s head and 500cc World Cup, and the victim D were fluord with the Defendant for drinking. When the victim D and fluord with the Defendant, the Defendant was fluording the victims of drinking and drinking, and when the Defendant was fluoring on the part of the victims and the breast part of the mother, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C on the treatment days for having the victim enter the joint on the part of the body, such as joint arms, chest, breast, etc., and caused the victim D to suffer injury in the number of days of treatment for getting the victim D’s eye, joints, and joints on the chest.

2. The Defendant violating the Immigration Control Act is an alien of Thailand’s nationality, and a person who, on June 4, 2014, may enter the Republic of Korea as a tourism visa (B-1) with the period of sojourn of 90 days and stay in the Republic of Korea until September 2, 2014.

A foreigner may sojourn in the Republic of Korea within the limits of his/her sojourn status and period of sojourn.

Nevertheless, the Defendant illegally stayed in the Republic of Korea without a valid status of stay from September 3, 2014 to September 1, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement C in the third interrogation protocol of the suspect to the defendant, among the third interrogation protocol of the defendant;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment of Case Documents, etc.), investigation reports (hereinafter referred to as the “CCTV video recording materials”), entries in an accusation against the violator of the Immigration Control Act at the request of an investigative agency, and the application of video Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 94 subparagraph 7 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 17 (1) of the Immigration Control Act (the point of sojourn going beyond the scope of the status of sojourn or the period of sojourn), the choice of imprisonment for each of the types of

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows.