At around 02:56 on September 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 202:56, at the window B of Changwon-si, had the victim’s panty panty in front of his residence; (b) had the victim’s panty to report her own panty; (c) opened the victim’s panty with the victim’s panty; (d) opened the 2nd floor space outside the victim’s panty with the victim’s panty; and (e) displayed the victim’s panty with the victim’s panty; and (e) opened the 2nd floor space outside the victim’s panty with the victim’s panty; and (e) opened the 40,000 won or more of the victim’s panty with the victim’s panty, and opened the victim’s panty with the victim’s panty with the victim’s 15,000 won or more; and (e) opened the victim’s 190th of the 20th of the pan.

Accordingly, the victims violated the victims' residence at night, stolen the victims' property and damaged the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of each appraisal document, gene appraisal document, field photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 330 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the points of larceny at night) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying and damaging property and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent criminals is the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] for the larceny of general property [Article 4] intrusion larceny [No person who is a special person] is the mitigated element among special siblings, and some victims are the criminal defendants.