도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On March 2, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Seoul Western District Court to a fine of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on June 23, 2008, a summary order of KRW 1 million as an identical crime from the Daejeon District Court's astronomical Branch to the same crime.
1. The defendant is in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury).
On April 4, 2020, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol of 0.088% with blood alcohol level around 01:58, and led to the driving of the front distance of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C apartment at a speed of about 40 km from the west on the west side at a speed of about 40 km in speed.
At the same time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as reducing the speed for those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle and keeping the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle safely.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting this, found the E-cab of the victim D (age 63) who was proceeding in the front bank due to negligence while driving the e-cab at the front bank, and received the e-cab from the front driver of the said cargo vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as fluoral salt, for about two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.
2. Around 01:58 on April 4, 2020, the Defendant driven a 2km truck from the front side of a restaurant located in the Goyang-gu Goyang-gu Sodong under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.088%, to the front side of the Seoul Eunpyeong-gu C apartment, Seoul.
Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. Investigation report (Report on the status of an employee);
1. A copy of a medical certificate;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: criminal records and references;