The 86 days of detention before this judgment is sentenced shall be included in the above sentence.

except that this shall not apply.

From August 2012, the Defendant established a sex relationship with C, which he came to know through an online game meeting, and came to know of pregnancy on July 2013 during the death of the Defendant, but did not notify C and his family members of the fact, and did not make any decision as to whether or not raising the child after childbirth.

On December 9, 2013, at around 17:40 on December 17:40, 2013, the Defendant sent a son’s name in the Epic room in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Epic”), and said, the Defendant told C to have a vegetable with a vegetable with a vegetable female toilet, and gave birth of a son’s name and vegetable (0 years of age) at around 18:30 on the same day.

The defendant, when notifying the victim of the fact of childbirth, anticipated that he could not rear the victim alone, and when the victim who was born on the side started to give sound, prevents the victim from entering the victim's face and knife for about 10 minutes by hand. If the victim's injury and knife the victim's injury and knife for about 10 minutes by her hand, she removed the suspension that had existed at the same time, put the victim in the plastic plastic paper to collect the victim's injury and caused the victim's death as a flife that has been abandoned in the toilet stop tank, and murdered the victim after the delivery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement by the prosecution against C;

1. A report on investigation (re-issuance of a written autopsy) (including a attached written autopsy);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the result of appraisal of a child);

1. Article 251 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 57 of the Criminal Act including days of pre-trial detention;

1. It is clear that the crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is a serious crime in which one human life is deducted, and it is necessary to strictly punish such a crime in light of the gravity of life.

However, at the time of committing the instant crime, the Defendant did not continue to marry as 24 years of age, and not only lack of economic ability, but also C, who is his father, is also social and social.