The punishment of the court below (five months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is a favorable sentencing factor, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake, the amount of damage is not so significant, and the fact that each of the crimes of this case is concurrent crimes between the previous conviction in the judgment of the court below that became final and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the fact that the same should be considered in

However, each of the crimes of this case is an unfavorable sentencing factor, such as the fact that the defendant continued to commit the same crime for a short period against many victims, and the nature of the crime is not good in light of the frequency and methods of the crime, the defendant has a number of identical criminal records including suspended sentence, and no damage has yet to be recovered. In light of the fact that there is no change in circumstances that may vary from the judgment of the court below and the punishment of this case, and the fact that there is no change in circumstances that the court below did not change, and other various sentencing materials in pleadings such as the background of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character, behavior, environment, etc., it is not recognized that

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.