A. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. There is no significant change in circumstances after the judgment of the court below to consider the sentencing of the defendant.

The Defendant may have been punished by fraud, fabrication of private documents, uttering of a falsified investigation document, etc., and the total sum of the damages in this case was 23,99 million won and did not recover from damage to his name.

Each of the instant criminal facts ought to be determined in consideration of equity with the case where each of the instant criminal facts is concurrent crimes established on March 22, 2016, in relation to the crime committed after Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

In light of all the circumstances asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is unreasonable or unreasonable, taking into account the following factors: (a) examining the sentencing conditions as indicated in the instant case’s records and arguments; and (b) examining the factors asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor.

3. Accordingly, all appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor cannot be accepted.