Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Defendant

A is a representative of a corporation, who is engaged in construction business, and the defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of engineering work business, building work business, etc.

1. If a foreigner who intends to find a job in the Republic of Korea intends to obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and no person shall employ any person who has no such status of sojourn;

Nevertheless, on June 10, 2014, the Defendant employed K, China, China, and China, China, which did not have such status of stay as above, to pay KRW 100,000 per day, and had it engage in simple labor by the 19th day of the same month.

2. In relation to the Defendant’s business, the Defendant employed a foreigner who was the representative of the Defendant, who did not have the status of stay as prescribed in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of employment of D;

1. Each notice of decision on examining an immigration offender, business registration certificate and certified transcript of register;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accusation to immigration offenders;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 18(3) of the Immigration Control Act, the selection of fines

(b) Defendant B corporation: Subparagraph 2 of Article 99-3, Article 94 Subparag. 9, and Article 18(3) of the Immigration Control Act

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act