The 100,000 won Check was stolen with ten copies.

2. The Defendant received 10,000 won check from the injured party on September 26, 2014, 100 won, and 10,000 won check on October 10 of the same year, respectively, from the injured party. The said check was suspected that the injured party was in in in a bad relationship with her husband.

C The author argues that it was only received in return for informing the whereabouts of the female owner, and that it was not stolen from the victim's bank.

As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, when the victim was in a temporary room for the defendant to go to the toilet on the date stated in the facts charged, the defendant was in a temporary room.

There are statements in the victim's investigative agency and court to the effect that 10,000 won check was stolen, and some of the checks that the victim stolen were deposited into the agricultural cooperative account under the name of the defendant, and financial account replys.

In this case, the victim argued that the stolen checks were prepared for the training of driving on the road, but did not make a consistent statement about the time and necessity of the training of driving on the road, and did not submit to the court the evidence to prove that the victim had a plan to undergo the training of driving on the road at the time. ② The victim did the defendant except on October 3, 2014, the date and time of the crime stated in the facts charged, other than on October 3, 2014.

9. That even on 26. 26., a 10,000 won check is lost;

In respect of the above check, the defendant did not file a complaint, and ③ the victim was the defendant.

C The whereabouts of a woman at the main point were found on September 2014.