beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.02.17 2020나24047

손해배상(자)

Text

The judgment of the first instance is revoked.

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

All costs of litigation shall be borne by the plaintiff.

the purport and purpose of the claim;

Reasons

Basic Facts

The defendant is a company that runs automobile sales business, etc.

On June 29, 2019, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract for used cars (hereinafter “instant contract”). At the time of the instant contract, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiff a record of the inspection of the performance of used cars (No. 1, 2, and No. 1, No. 1, No. 2, and No. 1, No. 2, and No. 1, No. 2; hereinafter “instant inspection record”) prepared on May 30, 2019 by the inspector of the performance status of the instant vehicle, with respect to the instant vehicle, for which the Plaintiff purchased used cars (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) from the Defendant for KRW 23,600,00.

The main contents of the inspection record of this case are as follows.

(15) Items of main device / in the state of engine operation (public revolving) of the relevant part / high-tension pumps (strest tampers) in which adequate cooling water can not be flowed at an appropriate quantity of oil flow, which is not flowed at an automatic transmission rate (less marked), dact engines (less indicated), and rupture ruptures (less marked) in the operation status (less marked) of both ruptures (no sign), in which the transmission of power ruptures (no sign is marked) are carried.

On July 2, 2019, the Plaintiff inspected the instant vehicle at D Company on July 2, 2019 due to the occurrence of a problem in the operation of the instant vehicle, which was indicated in the Rod and S-N-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-

E. Socksorber (shocksborber): Tracocksor, a shock absorption device, which is a shock absorption device.