Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a person who has been divorced by agreement on July 22, 2010 with the victim C (nive, 51 years of age) and the victim C.

The defendant, who takes a telephone from a hospital where the victim of ordinary sense is working, has another employee take an examination or take a bath against the victim, and has the victim take a telephone or find it in a hospital on several occasions.

c. Dispatching text messages to the effect that they would avoid disturbance;

The defendant continued to receive money from the injured party who caused the loss of work due to the change of money.

On June 24, 2016, at around 07:20 around June 24, 2016, the Defendant sent money to the victim as “the director” with a cell phone from a member in Seoul Metropolitan City.

(b)the sending of text messages to the effect that “”;

If the victim fails to comply with this, he/she is found to the hospital working for the victim.

In the same day, 50,000 won was remitted to the company bank account in the name of the defendant at around 16:23 on the same day from the person suffering from the fluent damage.

In addition, the Defendant, from May 2, 2016 to June 26, 2016, took a total of KRW 1,440,000 from the damaged person over 20 times in the same manner as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Copy of a remittance passbook;

1. Application of text-based statutes;

1. Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act chosen to impose a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;