2. The Defendant is the first offender, and the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes in the first instance.

However, the Defendant took part in the organized crime of telecommunications fraud (tentatively referred to as “singing”), which has great social harm.

In particular, the Defendant performed an important role in the crime of Bosing, such as duplicating telephone numbers so as not to disclose the contact information of the Bosing fraud organization by installing mobile wawa in his own residence, and received money in return therefor.

The amount of damage in this case is at least KRW 27 million, and the damage has not been recovered.

In addition, considering all the factors of sentencing as shown in the pleadings, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable and it is not likely that the sentencing of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.