However, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

1. Defendant B’s special injury on April 28, 2018: (a) around 23:50, at D entertainment tavern located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and at the time of trial due to the settlement of the drinking value with the victim A (27 years old) and the alcohol rate, Defendant B was subject to assaulting the body from the victim; (b) was able to take one time the head of the victim’s body by taking advantage of beer disease, which is a dangerous object on his/her table, and went off the victim’s face by ice, which is a dangerous object.

On the other hand, the Defendant continuously purchased the victim’s left arms in front of the F convenience point in Gangnam-gu Seoul, which is a dangerous object of assaulting the victim to drink from the victim in front of the F convenience point in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and caused injury to the victim, such as the following arms, which requires approximately 14 days of treatment.

2. When Defendant A suffered assault from the victim as described in paragraph (1) in an entertainment drinking club with the victim B (the age of 27) at the time and time specified in paragraph (1), Defendant A’s bodily injury caused the victim to suffer from assault as described in paragraph (1) in front of the F convenience point specified in paragraph (1). Defendant 1 assessed the victim’s face at a number of times in front of the F convenience point, and assessed the victim’s face and the victim’s face going beyond the floor into drinking, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as an injury, such as an external wound, flick, left-hand click, etc., which requires medical treatment for about

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol of each police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and written diagnosis of each injury;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant B: Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Discretionary mitigation (Defendant B) Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. The scope of recommending sentencing guidelines for sentencing provided for in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the reasons of sentencing and attending lectures;

1. The defendant A (Scope of Recommendation) general injury shall be type 1 (General Injury).