beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.02.10 2015구합68147

유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

From December 12, 2013 to February 22, 2014, Dae Young General Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) performed the said construction as the contractor of the instant construction work of building a mutually beneficial neighborhood living facility (hereinafter “instant construction”). On February 3, 2014, the Plaintiff’s husband’s husband DoD (hereinafter “the deceased”) was employed as a daily worker for the installation of a large-scale mold.

On February 16, 2014, at around 08:06, the Deceased was found by the 119 first responder in a state where he was worn with a hacker with a hacker with a hacker, which was installed on the outer wall between the third and fourth floor of the construction site of this case, and the hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker. At the

In the body autopsy report on the deceased, the private person of the deceased is indicated as “sworn fluorial fluorial fluorial fluor.”

The Plaintiff claimed for the payment of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant, but the Defendant rendered a decision on August 4, 2014 on the ground that “the deceased’s death was caused by acute funeral and not related to an accident, and it is not confirmed that a sudden change in business environment, an increase in business burden, or a chronic excess fact is not confirmed.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee dismissed it on March 19, 2015.

[The grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition and the overall purport of the argument by Gap’s evidence, and the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition, had maintained the blood pressure in a normal state by continuously melting drugs related to high blood pressure since 2007. However, the snow that 8 days of the date of the accident did not properly lower the temperature of eight days.