When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 00:15 on February 19, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant’s body in front of the C convenience store located in Osan-si B, with the report of 112 and controlled the Defendant’s her her her her son F, thereby demanding a alcohol measurement. In order to restrain this, the Defendant her her son F, her son’s her son, her son’s her son, and her her son’s her son her son her son her son her son her

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on drinking control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The act of causing violence to a police officer who is called out for a report on the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment and demands the measurement of drinking due to lawful performance of his duties, shall be deemed to be such that the nature of the crime is light;

subsection (b) of this section.

Although there is no criminal history of the same kind, the accused has been punished by a fine several times due to drinking driving, etc.

The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing, including these points.