[Criminal Records] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on November 26, 2015 by imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) at the Jung-gu District Court on November 18, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 26, 2015, and is currently under suspended sentence.

[2] On March 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim E (44 years) in front of the restaurant of “D” located in Kuri-si, Guri-si on March 19, 2016; (b) placed the victim’s head part at one time; (c) placed the victim’s head part of the victim’s head at one stop; and (d) placed the victim’s head head at one time with a hack (one metal material, 50cm) which is a dangerous object in the surrounding area, and the victim’s head at one time with a head hack, etc., the victim’s number of days of treatment could not be identified.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the fact that the victim was injured by his/her client while she was harming the victim)

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a crime;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: (A) a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, reporting of the previous convictions in each disposition and reporting of the results thereof, and applying text 2 of the judgment;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

1. As to the assertion that there was no satch with a satch with a satch with a satch, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that there was no satch with a satch with a satch with a satch with a satch. However, according to the witness E’s statements in investigation agencies and courts, consistent statements in investigation agencies and courts, witness F’s statement in the police interrogation protocol, some statements in the police interrogation protocol against the Defendant, images of damaged photographs, etc., the Defendant’s decision is a dangerous thing that is surrounding