beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.08.28 2018가단31756

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The request of an independent party intervenor shall be dismissed;

2. Regarding the accidents listed in Appendix 1,

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who engages in construction machinery leasing business under the trade name of “B”, and is the owner of C Les and the Kabswegs used for the fixing, and the Defendant is a corporation with the aim of a special cargo transport business, etc., and an independent party intervenor (hereinafter “participating”) is an insurer who has concluded a liability insurance for cargo loading with the Defendant for cargo transport.

B. The Plaintiff entered into a contract to load and unload and install wind power (only “sulll power”) and parts, etc. at the installation site for wind power generation. The Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant to transport sule wind power and wind power generation parts, such as tower, day, etc.

C. On January 21, 2016, the Plaintiff’s employees requested transportation of Karwawa to move the said Trarwait to another place of work within D, and the Defendant’s employees directed the Defendant’s employees E to transport wind power.

E During the transport of the Karwa to F vehicles owned by the Defendant, there was an accident where the fixed chain chain was cut and 10 tons of the Karwawait and 12.4 tons of the 10 tons of the Karwait and 12.4 tons of the lab (hereinafter “instant accident”).

The accident of this case occurred in the above 10 ton of the 10 ton of the 12.4 ton of the 12.4 ton of the 12.4 ton of the 12.4 ton of the 12.4 ton of the 12.4 ton of the 12.4 ton of the 1 ton ton of the stopper. D.

On April 9, 2016, the Plaintiff received KRW 100 million from a cargo mutual aid association to which the Defendant was a member of the Cargo Mutual Aid Association, as a compensation for damages arising from the instant accident, and filed a lawsuit claiming damages against the Defendant under the Chuncheon District Court 2016Gahap50361 (hereinafter “prior lawsuit”). The Intervenor participated in the said lawsuit for the Defendant.

The above court shall use three damaged Kazwait (hereinafter referred to as the “instant wait”) for its original purpose.